Comments:Iran to build ten new uranium enrichment plants

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Iran is a beep

So Wikinews rips this article off from Voice of America, and posts it here? Umm, yah... uncool. Say something you mofo's!
Voice of America is in the public domain. This means we are well within our rights to use any or all of its text on this website. All articles based on such text have information added and/or corrected from a second source, for the purposes of verifiability and neutrality. This is not some effortless copy-paste, but a re-use of public domain material with relevant corrections and additions made by our team of editors. Sometimes, there is not enough interest in a topic within the community for a full article to be written from scratch, and this is seen as a better alternative to having no article at all. Dendodge T\C 12:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Great swordEdit

Iran should not arouse concern. Georgia is the most dangerous flashpoint. The Bible says: "At the appointed time [the king of the north = Russia] will return back [will regain the influence, which it lost after the break-up of the Soviet Union] and come into the south [many indicate that this might be Georgia], but it will not be as the former [1921] or as the latter [2008]. For the dwellers of coastlands of Kittim [the West] will come against him, and he will be humbled, and will return." (Daniel 11:29,30a) Then Iran will be humbled also. "But ships will come from the direction of Kittim, troubling Asshur [Russia] and troubling Eber [inhabiting on the other side the Euphrates]." (Numbers 24:24a, BBE)

At that time, peace will be taken from the earth and the "great sword" - nuclear sword - will be used. (Revelation 6:4) However, it will be neither the great tribulation nor "the end of the world" (Armageddon). As Jesus foretold, that will be "the beginning of birth pains". (Mathew 24:7,8)

If the Heavens planned a full return of Russia (and much suggests this) the present economic crisis will deepen. Then also the European Union and NATO will not stands.

In the same way the earlier prophecy had fulfilled: "And (he) [the king of the north = Russia] will go back (to) his land with great wealth [1945]; and his heart (will be) against the holy covenant [state atheism]; and will act effectively; and turned back to his own land [the break-up of the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact, the return of Russian troops to country]." (Daniel 11:28)

uhh... okay. I guess I can live with that rant, seeing as how it's in the comments section. At least it's not trying to be real news. — (talk) 19:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Honestly, though I see myself as a christian, one can take said prophesy in any number of ways. I wouldnt nessesarily count the world as ending just yet. (talk) 16:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)