Comments:Internet group Anonymous hacks No Cussing Club's website, owner's e-mail account
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
http://nocussingclub.com made me want to swear—!@@#@#$ my eyes. Seriously that site is really ugly. Might as well wrap it in a blink tag. Not surprising someone hacked it. Bawolff ☺☻ 03:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- My eyes they hurt!--KDP3 (talk) 04:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Such a terrible website. I wanted to swear so bad after seeing this website...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 184.108.40.206 (talk • contribs)
OK, so right after I mention a favorite song of mine in a swearing-on-comments-pages thread, we get this. I'm sorry. I just have to say it:
We Are ANONYMOUSEdit
haha... that story is great... We had a lot of fun doing it too... its really easy after you do a little research.. haha —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anonymousislegion666 (talk • contribs)
This is just advertisingEdit
There are 1000s of websites that get defaced daily, just because they call themselves "Anonymous" doesnt mean it should be news or they are so great. Zone-H keeps records of attacks and they have special ways of keeping track of them. Also, ive never even heard of nocussing.com. --Ub3rst4r (talk) 02:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Agree. How is this news-worthy? Is WikiNews getting desperate for new content? 220.127.116.11 07:13, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
I had never heard of nocussing.com before this article... Has the person who hacked it ever heard of the Streisand Effect? Defacing sites just isn't a good way to point out their flaws. Wtachi (talk) 04:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Wow...some hacking group. I bet its so fun to hack the website of a 16 year old kid. I'm in awe, these guys are amazing. They're such amazing hackers, I bet it was so worth their time too. The bastard nerds probably threw a counterstrike Lan party in celebration of this fine achievement. Their life long goals are complete. I just have one question for them though, do they actually feel human? I find it difficult to understand just how this accomplished anything to anyone, anywhere on this entire planet. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 18.104.22.168 (talk • contribs)
- despite its uselessness, vandalism is an activity enjoyed by very many people (and I'm don't necessarily mean online vandalism. Look at your local bridge in your town. it probably has been vandalized). Not everyone's goal in life is to be useful to society. (if it was, we wouldn't need courts). Bawolff ☺☻ 06:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Seriously? This is front page stuff? I know Wikinews often will feature stories that most people would consider of marginal importance, but this is really pushing triviality to new limits. 22.214.171.124 01:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Uh... everything on Wikinews goes onto the front page. That's just how it works. This IS NOT WIKIPEDIA! Gopher65talk 16:19, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Good for McKay!Edit
And I hope Dmitry never sees the light of day again, that bastard. 126.96.36.199 17:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Got what they deservedEdit
Ok I have been with anon since I was young. and sure not everything we do is completly legal. However sometimes there are people doing unethical or otherwise faggy shit and there isnt always a legal way to expose them. This occurance is another pefect example of how although anon breaks laws they break it with a satirical yet benevolent purpose. They don't just do it to be bad but rather to expose truths that otherwise would have remained hidden. There will always be secrets that the world needs to know and anonymouse will always be there to find then and bring "great justice".
I just thaught of a better way to explain this.
If a guy with a guy fawkes mask trespasses on private property and breaks an entering to a highly secure facility and then takes picturs of a massive underground drug ring/ gun sale/ human trafficing and then the cops come and he presents the images. Who should really be arrested? The people doing the dirty that the anon obtained evidence of through less then legal means or the anon? Or even both.. a sacrifice can be made on the part of the anon. He can go to jail because that is the price to expose a bigger crime that the cops and legal officials cannot.
Why the hell is this included in the story?Edit
"The NCC is located in South Pasadena. According to the California Penal Code §502 part C of the computer hacking laws, depending on the offense if caught, punishments could be a "fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months, or two or three years, or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars ($5,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment"."
That has nothing to do with anything. Is this some retarded threat from whomever threw together this sorry excuse for a story?
Alright, This kid dont want me (speaking for nonsupporters) to cuss. That's just like him tyrannizing us cause there is the freedom of speech But i do think that the account shouldnt have been hacked cause if you can dish it you can take it. Meteorman7228 (talk) 01:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC) Also i retract that statement but he still takes away the freedom of speech Meteorman7228 (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC) But,kid Let us swear i wanted to so bad after hearing that he started it, you suck bad and i dont retract it Meteorman7228 (talk) 02:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Bull shit. Ncc diserved to be hacked... The kid is really asking for a fuckin slap across the face. You can really tell he was a failed abortion.
I agree, ncc deserved it, like i said the kid sucks. Dont people see that hes a tyrant thats just trying to limit what we say, i agree with your statement --Meteorman7228 (talk) 00:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments from feedback form - "shit"Edit
I live in South Pas. and this whole no cussing thing is stupid, everyone thinks its just a joke! My friend was added to the 'No Cussing Club', just because she's their neighbor. She also has to wake up to creepy Hatch heads on their van every day. Just to let everyone know, most of the neighbors don't like them. They would most likely SELL their kids to get PROFIT off them.
Comments from feedback form - "Fake and gay"Edit
Comments from feedback form - "PERFECT!"Edit
What the hell do they think they're doing? What a stupid, pointless little club. They even made swearing illegal in his town. Great job, kid. Now everybody has to swear in code. *Bangs head against wall*
—188.8.131.52 (talk) 13:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC) Piss'd off
oh wow.... he tries to limit our freedom of speech. FUCK YOU MCKAY
WHAT THE FUCKEdit
MCKAY, Y U LIMIT FREEDOM OF SPEECH