Comments:IEEE approves 802.11n standard after six years
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Bout time --Gimmethegepgun (talk) 17:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Seriously. I've already got N in most of my newer hardware, and it wasn't even officially out yet. They need to get their act together and not take so long. Either that or make the upgrades MAJOR improvements. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 21:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
They were not improving it - they were approving it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.23.170.92 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 18 September 2009 (UTC)