Comments:Huckabee, Obama win Iowa caucuses
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
I'm just curious as to what information is available in the media about Presidential canidate Ron Paul. Also, I'd like to know how he is doing in the various primary elections.
- I agree it looks like he got a very low vote tho, its a shame but i suppose if fox, ignore him and call him crazy then so will alot of republicans! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.15.151.180 (talk) 04:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Huckabee, Obama win Iowa caucuses
editThe following statement about the Republican campaign in Iowa "often turbulent campaign which often focused on issues of religion and negativism rather than on more substantive platform issues" is in itself a negative generality. This kind of opinion reporting is the cause of much dissatisfaction with the mainstream media today. This is a free country and whether or not we agree with others the idea that some issues are "substantive" and others are not is purely bias. I read Wikinews to hopefully avoid this kind of "reporting" we get from most media today. Patricia Eberlein, Mobile, AL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.165.51.190 (talk) 12:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've removed that statement. Diligent Terrier 20:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)