Comments:Former Wikileaks employee destroys unpublished leaked documents

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

This article has a ways to go grammatically. For instance, what does it mean that he/she has destroyed the leaks TO Julian Assange's site? Do you mean he/she has removed them from the site? Punctuation and capitalization aren't perfect either; it should read, "...between the pair, and has now..."

Furthermore I think this article uses too many quotations for things that could just be reworded.

Also I believe there's more weight put on the perspective of OpenLeaks than that of Wikileaks.

Very well written, very comprehensive, very insightful. I would not have known about this issue if it wasn't for uowakm.

Who/what is uowakm?

The contributor from University of Wollongong who started the article. ;)