Comments:Files will risk 'countless' lives, Obama administration warns Wikileaks

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Comments from feedback form - "its reliable because the impor..."

its reliable because the important points are really marked in such a manner that one can easily point out and understand it in simple way (talk)19:52, 30 December 2010

Comments from feedback form - "fucking traitor u should have ..."

fucking traitor u should have your fucking balls cut off and shoved down your throat u fucking block head your dragging england down also hope they scalp you u fucking bastard (talk)20:29, 29 November 2010

Um.... Yeah, that's really intelligent.

Julian Assange should win the Nobel Peace Prize. He's the last of a dying breed of journalists who's actually interested in revealing the truth, rather than protecting corporate profits. (talk)01:21, 30 November 2010

.. and rape. But also the truth stuff. (talk)18:00, 1 December 2010

You realize that he's probably correct, and its just a political attempt to smear his name. If I were two faced and without morals, I'd pay up the nose to get two girls to say that he raped them. Instant success. Unless of course the public realized my plans, or say, someone posted them up on the internetz. Oh wait.... (talk)08:56, 9 December 2010

Comments from feedback form - "Please don't release this docu..."

Please don't release this documents, think about the familys and people the will suffer. (talk)23:48, 28 November 2010

The guy contacted the state department a few days ago asking which document will endanger which person/life. The state department said it will not negotiate ... take it from here ... (talk)20:44, 29 November 2010

What are they afraid of? Do they have something to hide? It's just confirming what the people have known for a long time... (talk)00:54, 30 November 2010

I still don't understand exactly who would have his life in risk because of these documents. (talk)01:02, 1 December 2010

I don't understand why someone wouldn't support this. Also; Names are changed. Its been said several times. Research people! (talk)08:54, 9 December 2010

Comments from feedback form - "gives me knowledge to the doma..."

gives me knowledge to the domain of reality (talk)07:51, 4 December 2010

Files will risk 'countless' lives, Obama administration warns Wikileaks

Obama and his gang of murdering pirates are already risking countless lives by prosecuting his fraudulent "war"; and have already murdered countless numbers of human beings in the name of their war(s) of conquest. Obama calls it foreign "policy". I figured out the truth. The term "policy" is a term of art which actually means "piracy". Anyway, Obama is not the "president". He is a total fraud and a liar. Obama was not born in the United States. He is not native born. He is not even a "naturalized" citizen. He is a citizen of Indonesia. He did not take the oath of office either. Therefore, the United States "government" is a headless "government" - which means, of course, that the United States "government" is nothing more than a street gang - a cabal of pirates and brigands. The "United States" is actually an unregistered private corporation - and has absolutely no legitimacy. There is a maxim in law which says "Pirata est hostis generi" [Latin]. Translated, it means "Pirates are the enemy of the human race". It is the United States "government" who are the traitors to the human race. So, to answer the idiots who claim that Julian Assange is a "traitor", I ask you one simple question. How can you be a traitor to traitors?

Twobirds (talk)11:27, 30 November 2010

I don't understand the question. If you betray somebody, you are a traitor, regardless of their own traitor status. Then again, I'm just a pirate sympathizer anyway, so I'm probably biased. (talk)18:02, 1 December 2010

Obviously you must be among the weak minded. No wonder you are a pirate sympathizer. For you, I must phrase the question so that a a person with an IQ of 50 can understand. How about this: How can you be a traitor to someone who has betrayed you? If you say you are a pirate sympathiszer then you are stating that you enjoy being a victim of mass murder. It is YOU who are being betrayed. It is all of us who are being betrayed. Wikileaks is NOT the traitor. They are merely ratting out the traitors who are murdering all of us. Do you think that you will not be murdered by the pirates? For you to say you are a pirate sympathizer, you are saying that you are in sympathy with the people who are going to murder you. Why don't you just commit suicide?

Twobirds (talk)19:45, 1 December 2010

There is no real evidence that Obama was born outside the US (all purported evidence was shown to be falsified). His oath of office was messed up, but he took it again later (but that wasn't televised because it was just two guys in a room for 30 seconds). Thus, the US government has a valid head and is actually well organised.

I also question your comparing of Obama to a pirate - pirates are generally seafaring and attack others for financial gain. What the US is involved in is a war, whether you agree with it or not. I also point out that Obama opposed the war and is making efforts to withdraw US troops from the Middle East.

And please refrain from personally insulting other users, it's earned you a 24-hour block.

Δενδοδγε τ\c19:55, 1 December 2010

Mon contrere. There is much evidence proving that Obama was a: Born in Kenya b: A citizen of Indonesia c: Real name: Barry Soetoro d: not even a naturalized citizen, but actually an illegal immigrant. You have not done your homework. You can't expect that your mere patent statements like "There is no real evidence that Obama was born outside the US" can have any credibility. You are probably a spin doctor working for the New World Order. There IS REAL EVIDENCE that proves Barack Obama is a fraud and a liar. In fact, after thoroughly investigating Barry Soetoro, I can state - with proof - that there is no real evidence proving that Barack Obama (real name - Barry Soetoro) was born in - or even naturalized in the United States. If you would like to find out the truth about Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Obama), try checking out this web link: This is only one place to start to look. Also try doing a search for "Barry Soetoro". You will be very surprised at what you learn. As far as Obama and Co. being "pirates", they are. Remember the "law" they operate under is called "The law of the sea" (aka "Admiralty" "law"; "The rule of necessity") They operate under a false "presumption" that they (and all of us) are "at sea". Our "Birth Certificate(s)" are merely ship's manifests showing evidence that we are given a "berth (birth)" on the "ship of state" - that we are mere cargo on the "ship of state" - we are chattel property to be used or abused according to the whims of our "owners". The problem with this whole scheme is that it is all fraud. In reality they don't own us. They don't "own" anything. They don't have the right to tell anybody what to do, how to act, or what to think or say. If you want to get even more technical, try tracing the chain of title to the succession of the United States government. You will discover that the "United States" ceased to exist in 1933 - when it declared bankruptcy ("civil death"). What took over, was a coup d'etat - by an act of "piracy" - yes, boys and girls - an act of piracy. It was piracy, because they all agreed to pretend that we were all "at sea" and placed us under the ""law" of the sea". The "government" that took over in 1933 has no credibility, because it was not ordained - or sanctioned by We the People. So you could say that we have had - not a headless "government" - but no "government" at all at least since 1933. The current "government" is - legalistically speaking - an unregistered private corporation doing business as "United States" or "United States Government" or any number of other monikers it decides to use at it's convenience. But if you look at what they do - and not what they say, you will then understand that they are nothing more than a cabal of pirates. To suit you, you could call them "brigands" instead of pirates. Brigandage is piratical act(s) committed on land. Brigandage is "land piracy" [Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Ed.]. Thank you for your kind attention.

Twobirds (talk)15:59, 3 December 2010

I am aware of the "Barry Soetero" conspiracy theory. The Kenyan birth certificate, a photograph of which has been circulating on the Internet, has been analysed and is most likely a forgery. I admit that I do not recall the Indonesia part, and am not familiar with it, but it sounds unlikely to me. Since you claim that my statements about a lack of evidence lack credibility, I would be very interested in hearing what evidence you have to support your claims - that website appears to put forward very little real evidence, and instead simply makes unfounded accusations that Obama is a Stalinist.

As for your references to the law of the sea , the Law of the Sea that you reference indeed only applies at sea, as the name suggests. The words birth and berth have entirely different etymologies, and nobody owns us (remember that insignificant little law the UN passed ages ago about human rights?) What is your complaint about the 1933 government, and why does it apply to the current government? Numerous new governments have been formed since then, in accordance with the relevant articles of the US constitution, whatever problems the 1933 government had (I am not familiar with that piece of American history; could you perhaps give me some more details?)

Δενδοδγε τ\c16:36, 3 December 2010

Dear Δενδοδγε: Any more discussion on this topic amounts to nothing more than mental masturbation. Your disingeniousness insults not only my intelligence, but the intelligence of others who read this information. It seems obvious you are not going to believe anything I - or others have to say about the fraud of Soetoro. You label it a "conspiracy theory". No. you are wrong. It is not a theory - but conspiracy fact. The story that Soetoro was born in the U.S. is the "conspiracy theory". You refuse to believe anything, but merely want to engage in ad hominum attacks against the messengers - not the truth. My advice: keep looking. There are hundreds of web sites dealing with the fraud. I checked you out. You are from the U.K. What could you possibly know - that would have any credibility - about American "law"? Please don't feel you have to respond to this update. Any more discussion on this topic between us would be useless. Besides, you and I are metely tiny atoms among the billions of beings in the human race. What could we possibly have to say - or do - that would mean anything?

Twobirds (talk)17:11, 3 December 2010

I have made no deliberate personal attacks whatsoever in this thread, and I apologise if anything I ahve said has come across persoanlly (I sincerely doubt anything I have said is as personal or as insulting as asking another user why they have not yet committed suicide, but that is by the by). I am from the UK, but I am reasonably well versed in international affairs and a number of aspects of both British and American law. I have no doubt that somebody called Barry Soetero was once born in the USA - it is such a large country that most names are likely to come up at least once - but I have not yet seen any real evidence that it is Obama's real name. Since you now seem to wish to withdraw from this discussion, I assume you are unable to find any evidence that will please my sceptical mind. I respect your right to do so, and to continue believing that Obama is not an American citizen, but I am afraid you have not succeeded in convincing me.

Δενδοδγε τ\c17:18, 3 December 2010

The public is too stupid to handle this

The public is too stupid to handle this, they can't grasp the idea that the US must act pragmatically in order to survive on the global stage. There will be a lot of unneeded outcry. (talk)03:44, 2 December 2010

Comments from feedback form - "Wikinews keeps me and countles..."

Wikinews keeps me and countless others up to date with the breaking news. The only thing to change is the presentation; try organising it a bit more with more headings and writing style according to relevance. Anyways, keep up the good work. (talk)19:01, 1 December 2010

Comments from feedback form - "Good news article"

Good news article (talk)13:53, 1 December 2010