Comments:Evangelist Hovind found guilty for tax fraud

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

• Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
• Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
• You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

It’s awfully disappointing that Kent Hovind not pay his taxes. I have watched Hovind’s seminars and I believe that they do speak the truth. Just because he made a mistake does not mean his theories and beliefs were incorrect. His seminars gave a voice against evolution and spoke about creation. But I must say that not all of the public is as forgiving as I am, for that Mr. Hovind has given evangelist, creationists, and Christians a bad reputation.

Mr. A —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.144.48.226 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 20 April 2007 He explained in CSE 103 that the government cannot legally force you to pay income tax, wich he was not doing, so they are the illegal ones. Anyway when an athiest gets arrested we don't make a webpage about it.

Income tax is not actually constitutional or legal when you closely analyse it, but such legal realisations are ignored. No one legally HAS to pay taxes, it's just it's terribly hard to win the case and prove taxes are illegal on a case-by-case basis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.158.138 (talk) 08:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "this is slander"

this is slander —98.121.176.189 (talk) 15:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "sorry - not the final one. you..."

sorry - not the final one. your subjectivity is clearly against the Person you write about. this ruins the article. —92.194.203.67 (talk) 21:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "I think, "Wiki," stands for, "..."

I think, "Wiki," stands for, "Wicked," and you who publish this information are wicked!!!! —68.83.10.24 (talk) 00:52, 8 August 2011 (UTC)