Comments:Earthquake strikes Melbourne, no reports of injuries

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Quake felt on Melbourne was an after shock from nuke accident.Edit

The place whre de geologists pointed as the epicenter hides few military research facilities.

Be aware, mate.

Things gonna get worst soon.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talkcontribs)

*eyeroll*Gopher65talk 03:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Sometimes the comments on Wikinews are worse than Youtube comments. Fephisto (talk) 10:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

What was the damage ?Edit

many accounts of Melbourne being shaken by the earthquake however "what did people have by way of damage"? Cracking of bricks tiles etc? Any one know?