Comments:Detroit’s population drops by one-fourth in the last decade
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
The math doesn't add up | 2 | 21:18, 25 March 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "Its a intresting article, i do..." | 0 | 11:06, 25 March 2011 |
One fourth...? | 1 | 10:08, 25 March 2011 |
If Detroit lost about 1 million people, a quarter of its population, then that means its population was once roughly 4 million. However, the article later says that the population has dropped below 750,000.
Also, the mayor's math is a bit off: If the population is 713,777 according to the latest census, the 35,000 people he says were not counted is still not enough to save the city. If they were all counted, there would be 748,777 people. It'd need to be slightly more than that,
Its a intresting article, i do think there needs to be more added to it. Perhaps to pass link to growing trend of "Urban Pairies". I hadn't heard about that before.