Comments:Dalai Lama threatens to resign if situation in Tibet worsens
Out of Context edit
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
His Holiness was quoted out of context here. For clarification you can see his site here.
I am slightly puzzled why the United States is always urging other countries to "tolerate" and "mediate" when they clearly have done nothing of the sort in the Middle East. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cade (talk • contribs) 03:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
RESIGNATION IS NOT THE SOLUTION,SIR.... edit
Resigning is equal to quitting from the field. The need of the hour is that how we can resolve thls issue of 1959.. In this regard, I feel that a dialogue between His Holiness
and the chinese government is the best way to settle the on going tensions in Tibet
Our His Holiness must come ahead and invite the chinese part to have a dialogue to solve
the onging issue in the presence of the delegations from U.N.O. The high profile venture
must take place in that country having cordial relation with both India and China.