Comments:Copiapó, Chile mining accident: in depth

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Comments from feedback form - "Louis Bumb -what I think of th..."

Louis Bumb -what I think of this page that it should be on the local news every day

because Ilike it (talk)15:23, 4 November 2010

Comments from feedback form - "poorly written, outdated"

poorly written, outdated (talk)17:55, 19 October 2010

It never ceases to amaze me how many people don't understand about news and its connection to the date on which it was published. WN:ARCHIVE if you please....

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs)17:56, 19 October 2010

What do you suggest? I'm sure you wouldn't be capable of writing a paragraph at most.

Diego Grez return fire22:20, 19 October 2010

Comments from feedback form - ""In depth"? Poor choice of wor..."

"In depth"? Poor choice of wording, surely? (talk)22:14, 18 October 2010

Comments from feedback form - "Nothing on the rescuers. Ever..."

Nothing on the rescuers. Everything here is standard press release, not "in depth" (talk)16:43, 14 October 2010