Comments:Church of England rejects compromise over women bishops

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Just Let 'Em

edit

By not letting Woman rise up the ranks of the church, then they are pretty much saying that god treats Woman and Men differently...165.228.245.201 (talk) 05:39, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "I completely agree, what'd poi..."218:05, 14 July 2010

Comments from feedback form - "I completely agree, what'd poi..."

I completely agree, what'd point of excluding woman when there are more woman in the world then men...what if they decide to exclude us =O DUN DUN DUN!!!!!

BKCW8 talk05:43, 12 July 2010

The point is for males involved in the Church to have control of it; it is an ongoing oppression against women. The Church has a long history of this which is easy to read up on. It probably won't change unless a change is somehow forced. It is one reason I like to keep my lifestyle secular.

69.72.120.252 (talk)19:29, 12 July 2010

It would be very interesting to hear what the alleged theological justifications are for disallowing female clergy.

67.142.172.23 (talk)18:05, 14 July 2010