Comments:Chinese spy network infiltrated foreign affairs, embassies

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

• Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
• Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
• You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

chinese are good for nothing human trafficking, drug chemists, and now what? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.69.218.181 (talk • contribs)

The people are fine. It's the government that's infuriating. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.209.8.195 (talk) 22:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Is this anything more than gossip from "think tanks"? Didn't think so. Not a story, not news worthy, not even real. 66.20.190.10 16:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

If Chinese officers see this news,wiki may be blocked in China.

Just like other forbidden things by Chinese,it's not strange.

--Dafengluobote (talk) 11:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

The point being? We don't self-censor to keep visible where censors operate. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 12:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

放屁

放屁！！！

"้ฟะ ะ้ำ ดีแา กนำห ะ้ฟะ หฟัฦ--Brian McNeil / ^talk 11:05, 23 May 2009 (UTC)