Comments:Canada acquits man wrongly jailed for over a decade over teen girl's murder
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
What a lot of POV for one article! Just because a hair isn't his - then his confession is false and he is innocent? Where is the logic in that? 75.41.110.200 (talk) 18:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- That isn't article POV. That is what the prosecution themselves have said. They didn't stay procedings indefinitely or anything like that - they acquited him. Legally, it is exactly the same as a not guilty verdict. Accordingly, if the man is cleared then the confession must be false. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 15:06, 29 October 2009 (UTC)