Comments:British Business Secretary Cable stripped of powers after 'totally unacceptable and inappropriate' comments

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "Very decent article, would jus..."212:34, 22 December 2010

Comments from feedback form - "Very decent article, would jus..."

Very decent article, would just like to see a couple more sources from tabloid and right-wing media (to provide balance; not because I agree with them!!)

Ronius (talk)10:02, 22 December 2010

The two 'types' of sources you mention are, effectively, synonymous.

If Cable's comments are true, I agree with him wholeheartedly; Murdoch is a blight on journalism. The man gave up his Australian citizenship to start building Faux news. Should we use them as a source? Or The Sun? Perhaps the WSJ? Or, do we go for a non-Murdoch right-wing RedTop,... Like The Daily Mail? (The paper that backed Hitler).

Brian McNeil / talk11:21, 22 December 2010
 

Sources are only cited if information in them is actually used; see WN:CS.

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs)12:34, 22 December 2010