Comments:Britain votes to leave the European Union

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
UNITED KINGDOM WILL HAVE NO FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR LEAVING THE EUROPEAN UNION016:50, 7 November 2016
I oppose014:56, 23 October 2016

UNITED KINGDOM WILL HAVE NO FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR LEAVING THE EUROPEAN UNION

It is my understanding that the London stock exchange equals the United States. The United Kingdom has access to commodities that the United States does not have such as Jade from China, rubies and diamonds through Johannesburg South Africa. Great Britain Can form a trade agreement with the United States for industrial items as food items such as Wheat, Corn, Beef. They also can trade for technological items through the Asian stock exchange. If they were not prepared for this matter they would not have voted to leave the European Union.

Christopher Alan Levingston16:50, 7 November 2016

Honestly, I oppose the whole thing. Economic issues are caused by Greece so if anyone should leave, it should be them.

Jackninja5 (talk)14:56, 23 October 2016