Comments:Boeing 767 cargo plane seriously damaged by fire at San Francisco

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

oh great another plane damaged by fire. -- 19:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[]

At least this one was parked... Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 19:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[]
true that -- 19:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC) but still awful -- 19:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[]
I agree there. New they cost $124.5 million to $169 million. Plus lost business, screwed contracts... Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 19:53, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[]