Comments:Automobile manufacturer Ford posts unexpected profits

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Blood Red Sandman

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


could this be the result of all those wacky right-wingers saying, "Buy AMURRICAN"?

Lol, I really love the blind hate.--KDP3 (talk) 22:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
It could be the result of all those wacky right-wingers saying, "I'm going to support companies not engaged in so much corporatism." Or maybe Ford is actually a better company than Government Motors or that other German company. 128.210.124.120 (talk) 14:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


Perhaps this profit could be attributed to the thousands of new ads they have on television now?  Penubag  11:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Could it be the non-American market? I dunno; in Europe Ford used to be viewed as making good value cars while in the States they made trucks etc (I don't think the European perception of the US market for Ford was very accurate, however). Nowadays, AFAIK they seem to have a fairly typical range of products for any manufacturer and they have them everywhere. GM, of course, do cars that drink fuel and costs lots of $$$$ so their losses are unsurprising, but big profits from any manufactutrer... Wow. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 12:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply