Comments:Amazon dips into memory hole to retrieve Orwellian works

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

• Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
• Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
• You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

As a prerequisite to me getting an ebook reader:

They have to have reasonable DRM. 71.120.114.83 (talk) 04:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Yea. Good luck with that. --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 04:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

There is no such thing as "reasonable DRM". Easily breakable DRM, yes - but you can't be sure any device will stay that way and not be updated. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 08:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

How Ironic

Comments from feedback form - "I like the title... very cleve..."

I like the title... very clever :P —Ragettho (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)