Comments:African HIV prevalence may also be physiological

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Shae

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Logical fallacy: correlation is not causation. Just because 2 things happen to occur at the same time (lack of Duffy gene; prevalence of HIV) it does not mean that one causes the other--especially since "the study [...] does not identify why the absence of the chemokine receptor in red blood cells increases susceptibility to HIV".

Shae (talk) 08:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply