Comments:ACLU commemorates anniversary of US Supreme Court decision on student free speech
Have U.S. schools changed their approach to freedom of speech between DINKLEBERG! (1969) and Gillman (2008)?Edit
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
ACLU should stop celebrating and get down to business. How do students have free speech when a student was just recently suspended for yielding a controversial sign when he wasn't even on school premises. He had called in absent that day and still got suspended for his speech. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 06:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)