Comments:46-passenger Venezuelan plane reported missing

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

• Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
• Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
• You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

how can it be missing? it definetely crashed —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.106.170.33 (talk • contribs)

Care to say how it "definitely crashed"? Antonio Rivero says that its official status is still just missing. Mouse among men 03:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

this is silly! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.94.180.143 (talk) 15:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Very Sad

Very Sad this :( --200.8.122.13 16:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Reason why

The pilots did not activate the AHRS prior to taxiing and they took off without the AHRS leading into a 270 bank instead of an 180 bank and they saw a mountain trying to pull up but it was too lot and the aircraft disintegrated upon impact leading to the deaths of all 43 on board.