Comments:2008 COMPUTEX Taipei starts for the future of ICT industry

Latest comment: 16 years ago by 71.56.114.89 in topic The Future of "WING"???

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

I like the whole thought of WiMax. :) --Remi (talk) 08:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Future of "WING"???

edit

Sigh, anytime there is a wikinews article whose title makes no sense to me its undoubtedly set in Taiwan. Like that Doritos Web 2.0 whatever article. "starts with the future of "WING"" makes no sense, I perused the article and WING did not become apparent. I get that this has something to do with WiMAX but these Taiwan articles are always written in such a bizarre cryptic language and always about some PR event thing. 24.99.56.15 11:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have you seen the final paragraph? I think , evidently, YOU DO NOT!!! WING should be W, I, N, and G.Brock contact... 12:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, now I know what WING means, still sounds like a PR campaign24.99.56.15 14:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

You seems that you don't like the style proposed by Taipei Computer Association, WING is a future trend that the government dedicatedly promoted, Ying-jeou Ma also said earlier in the Opening Ceremony that I participated. Forgot, better to see Commons Photos all taken by me. Brock contact... 14:50, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about the article sounds like an advertisement71.56.114.89 14:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply