Comments:'Not guilty' plea from Abdulmutallab on Detroit jet bombing charges
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Not guilty? And his explosive underwear were supposed to be what? A festive celebration item? A weird sex aide? A insipid suicide device after realizing he was about to go to Detroit? I cannot believe it.—68.224.36.62 (talk) 06:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Brent
- It safe to say its open and shut case.--KDP3 (talk) 07:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- It's a publicity thing. He's going to use the 'the US are our enemies' defence; he won't for a second believe it will work but he wants his comments reported in the media. He also wants to waste everyone's time. It is, if you like, trolling - btu with more serious consequences. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 16:26, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- He will milk the propaganda out of this for his "cause"--KDP3 (talk) 17:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)