Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Removal/TUFKAAP (admin re-confirmation)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for reconfirmation. Please do not modify it.

TUFKAAP edit

So, I've recently become active again and I feel I haven't been living up to my administrative duties plus we have alot more new users since I dropped off the radar to cool my heels and I want to see what they think of me. ;) --TUFKAAP 00:10, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support TUFKAAP staying an admin. DragonFire1024 00:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great user when I've seen him around. Thunderhead ► 00:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support: the under review policy proposal is for people who have left planet wiki -Edbrown05 01:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"planet wiki", I like that terminology :) -Edbrown05 01:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps that's why the blog aggregator (sp) is called Planet Wikimedia? Anyways Ed, you're Wikinews ' "Resident Witty one-liner speechwriter" ;) --TUFKAAP 03:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Once an admin, always an admin (unless you do something to get your privileges revoked). I oppose WN:IPOL. --SVTCobra 03:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support votes mean to DE-ADMIN. See the top of this section. DragonFire1024 06:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

No it doesn't. This is the reconfirmation section.

Support reconfirmation. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 07:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Supp. reconfirmation. –Doldrums(talk) 02:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support reconf., definitely has my trust and support.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 16:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I joined after this user became admin and I see that he has not abused his admin privileges. I oppose WN:IPOL. —Fellow Wiki Newsie 17:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support reconfirmation.Jacques Divol 16:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support You have done nothing to warrant the removal of your privilages. --Skenmy^{(t•c•w•i)} 17:17, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support. Bawolff ☺☻ 19:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good User, I remember him well from my early times here. WN:IPOL would not apply in this case anyway. That reminds me, we better hurry up and get that good policy adopted. Brian | (Talk) | ^{New Zealand Portal} 00:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of the Admin's page or the talk page of the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.