Talk:Sudanese President releases all detained journalists
Review of revision 1279631 [Failed] edit
Revision 1279631 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:13, 28 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1279631 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:13, 28 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1279877 [Passed] edit
Revision 1279877 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 08:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: A significant amount of work was required prior to giving this pass. I strongly recommend the submitter check the history of the article to see some of the required changes. A further recommendation is to use only those sources actually required; this speeds the review process considerably. "Technical" changes to provide good layout are less-critical than: not speculating, keeping your own opinion/POV out of the article, not assuming things are linked unless stated by one of the players, avoiding acronyms which are unexplained, avoiding repetition, and omitting needless words. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1279877 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 08:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: A significant amount of work was required prior to giving this pass. I strongly recommend the submitter check the history of the article to see some of the required changes. A further recommendation is to use only those sources actually required; this speeds the review process considerably. "Technical" changes to provide good layout are less-critical than: not speculating, keeping your own opinion/POV out of the article, not assuming things are linked unless stated by one of the players, avoiding acronyms which are unexplained, avoiding repetition, and omitting needless words. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |