Talk:Polls held for US state and local elections, with incomplete GOP success

Review of revision 907182 [Failed]

Revision 907182 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: This VOA article based off AP content which makes it not public domain sadly. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Could be passed if it was re-worked... otherwise, let's cover the results. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 907182 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: This VOA article based off AP content which makes it not public domain sadly. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Could be passed if it was re-worked... otherwise, let's cover the results. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

From what i understand reading VOA's copyright disclaimer, all text on the site is PD. The AP content tag simply means they used them as a source, not that they copied AP. Tempodivalse [talk] 02:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Specifically, this: You are welcome to use any material that is published by voanews.com [...] There is no need to request further permission. There a mention about AP photos being copyright - but nothing is mentioned about prose being copyrighted. Tempodivalse [talk] 02:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

• VOA will be paying for AP content, I'd expect lifts - and AP have menaced bloggers for copying there lede from stories before. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 03:00, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

• How ever the VOA gets the content, you know it is legit. More importantly the VOA publishes PD, so what ever their contract with AP/Rueters, will allow them to republish their bits PD like. Though they probably have restrictions as to how much. --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 03:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Review of revision 907260 [Passed]

Revision 907260 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 907260 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Adding Category:Michael Bloomberg

This article is missing the Category:Michael Bloomberg tag, may someone with sufficient permission please add the tag. Cocoaguy (talk) 17:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Done --Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 18:27, 1 January 2010 (UTC)