Talk:Indian IT minister says government will not censor social media

Review of revision 1405075 [Passed]

Revision 1405075 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The coverage here is thin. It doesn't make clear that a law was passed last year, and doesn't mention that the judge threatened to block the sites and explicitly compared such a block to what's been done in China. Because there is contention between parties as to whether the law is censorship, it seemed we'd do well to avoid asserting that it is censorship. It sounds as if there may be far more going on between the court and the defendants than is unambiguously verifiable from the sources. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1405075 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The coverage here is thin. It doesn't make clear that a law was passed last year, and doesn't mention that the judge threatened to block the sites and explicitly compared such a block to what's been done in China. Because there is contention between parties as to whether the law is censorship, it seemed we'd do well to avoid asserting that it is censorship. It sounds as if there may be far more going on between the court and the defendants than is unambiguously verifiable from the sources. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.