Talk:Herman Cain: SimCity rumor 'a lie'

Review of revision 1302966 [Not ready]

Revision 1302966 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:41, 16 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I'm not comfortable that the two-independent-sources requirement has been met on this; but it should be readily fixable. The two essential elements of the lede —the denial and the attribution of the accusation to Amanda Terkel— are both verified only by the Huffington Post. If it was played on The Rachel Maddow Show, surely an MSNBC source can be provided? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1302966 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:41, 16 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I'm not comfortable that the two-independent-sources requirement has been met on this; but it should be readily fixable. The two essential elements of the lede —the denial and the attribution of the accusation to Amanda Terkel— are both verified only by the Huffington Post. If it was played on The Rachel Maddow Show, surely an MSNBC source can be provided? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

I've added two more sources, including a local story on the response.--William S. Saturn (talk) 22:21, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1303856 [Passed]

Revision 1303856 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1303856 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.