Talk:European Commission warns Eurozone economy to shrink further

Review of revision 1818034 [Not ready]

Revision 1818034 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Length Comments by reviewer: An excellent article and a valuable contribution.....I almost ready'd it. However, the length is just a hair short......3 paragraphs, comprising not less than 3 sentences each. I'm highly tempted to bypass that requirement (even as I type this), but we need to hold doggedly to our standards here. Drop a few more bits into the last paragraph and it'll be there! --Bddpaux (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1818034 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Length Comments by reviewer: An excellent article and a valuable contribution.....I almost ready'd it. However, the length is just a hair short......3 paragraphs, comprising not less than 3 sentences each. I'm highly tempted to bypass that requirement (even as I type this), but we need to hold doggedly to our standards here. Drop a few more bits into the last paragraph and it'll be there! --Bddpaux (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

I've added a couple more sentences to the last paragraph. Hope that gets it up to the necessary standard. :-) --Computron (talk) 19:09, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1818773 [Passed]

Revision 1818773 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 07:37, 23 February 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1818773 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 07:37, 23 February 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.