Talk:Activists claim police harrassment as G20 summit nears

Review of revision 886007 [Passed]

Revision 886007 of this article has been reviewed by The wub (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 886007 of this article has been reviewed by The wub (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

NPOV?

"already claiming"? "everything from universal healthcare to an end to capitalism"? Anything can exist in the middle there :-p (albeit it would come largely from the left; I figure some libertarian and right-wings folks will be attending as well, particularly the anti-NWO theorists)

Interestingly, I can't tell the bias of this author... which is a good thing, but there's enough veering that someone on the left is going to say "this is a ring-wing attack piece", and folks on the right are going to say "this is left-wing attack piece" just by the reading the lede. Perhaps "already" from "already claiming" should be dropped? Xavexgoem (talk) 10:51, 24 September 2009 (UTC)