Comments:Urban fox 'mauls' two babies in London, England

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Why?001:02, 9 June 2010
Has anyone thought as to WHY the fox attacked them?
I mean it HAD to have a reason to go into the house.
Seeing as how it had to climb some stairs at least to get them, if it was hungry there are easier targets then that, especially as it didnt continue attacking and was instead just standing there ¬_¬
Why didnt it run away when it was discovered? Apparently all it did was dodge the husbands attacks by a few inches each time.
Sickens me how everyone's blaming the fox without thinking about it...
"Oh its a wild animal, of course it would go out of its way to attack babies! Its what wild animals do! They spend all their time thinking about how to injure / maim and kill all of us!"
188.221.215.100 (talk)01:02, 9 June 2010