Comments:Nothing honourable in honour killings, says Indian court

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Comments from feedback form - "That's not how you spell 'hono..."

That's not how you spell 'honor' you crazy Brit.

72.242.242.210 (talk)20:13, 10 May 2011

Fun fact: The United States speaks a version of a language called 'English'.

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs)20:14, 10 May 2011
 

I prefer the U in honour; seems that's something the USians, conveniently, dropped.

-P
Brian McNeil / talk23:59, 10 May 2011

That's not how you spell "honour", you crazy American. If you want to bugger up the English language by dropping letters from it, feel free, but don't expect the sane part of the English speaking world to copy you.

BarkingFish (talk)12:18, 11 May 2011

We 'USians' like our simplicity; you Brits apparently like custom. A lot of English words are filled with unnecessary letters, so we try our best to remove what we can. You, on the other hand, like to keep every letter that can possibly be saved! You like the monarchy and the House of Lords, whereas we see those institutions as superfluous. And you make your women wear those awfully hideous hats, while we (thankfully) got rid of them a long time ago. :)

I don't view British culture with the disdain of the original poster; in fact, I'm often fascinated by British culture, simply because it's so different and un-American! And while I see the previous IP's post as tasteless, I think that we should approach each other's cultures not with bitterness, but rather with jest.

128.135.100.102 (talk)06:55, 12 May 2011

Per a previous comment elsewhere, I do not like the Monarchy or the House of Lords.

In fact, with people in the U.S. obsessing more over the recent royal wedding, I proposed selling the Sax-Coburgs, as a job lot, to the States.

The House of Lords? Might I suggest its occupants be relocated to the Tower of London, and that made into a petting zoo. The then-vacant Westminster building could be used as a shelter for the homeless. The percentage of people asleep in the building would remain unchanged.

Brian McNeil / talk07:28, 16 May 2011
 
 
 
 

Comments from feedback form - "I'm glad the Indian Supreme Co..."

I'm glad the Indian Supreme Court has taken this stance! While I'm normally a big supporter of subsidiarity, I think that in this case, it's appropriate for the national court to override local custom.

128.135.100.102 (talk)20:05, 10 May 2011

I agree; it's great to finally see a major government condemn this insanity for what it is.

139.18.198.30 (talk)03:35, 11 May 2011